Prepared pack route · 12 of 12
Working document — we prepare this pack
If you are preparing a working document or pre-meeting position, match this route below. We prepare the pack. If the final plan is still wrong afterwards, you may then appeal (usually contents) within 2 months.
Where the LA notifies proposed amendments, SEND Regulations 2014 regulation 22 requires at least 15 days for representations — check your letter. A Tribunal appeal is generally only available after a final decision.
From £249 · you review before you send · not legal advice
Use this page as advice. If you want us to prepare the pack, match your situation or go to pricing — from what you already have.
What is your EHCP situation?
Tell us where you are. We match the document you need to send, then an assigned case professional prepares it. You review it. You send it.
I want to challenge a refusal or EHCP decision
Continues to your pack match — about 60 seconds.
What we prepare for this
Challenge to the plan · £449
Grounds or a letter when the plan, placement, provision or timescales are wrong.
- The document you send
- How to send it, and what to attach
- One revision round of factual corrections
One case professional prepares and checks it. You review it. You send it.
Typically 5 working days after we have what we need.
Other documents: request letter £249 · appeal grounds £349 · challenge to the plan £449
I disagree with the current draft wording in the sections listed below. For each point I set out the wording I want instead and the evidence that supports it, so the working document reflects my child's needs and the provision required before any final plan is issued.
This situation maps to
Working document / pre-meeting support
One of 12 EHCP routes we prepare — match above, then we draft the pack.
What we prepare
We prepare this pack for your route
Your pack includes materials for working-document prep — disputed wording, preferred alternatives, and evidence to take into the discussion.
Draft wording for this route
Parent position, working-document comments and proposed wording for each disputed section.
Common LA / school positions
Mapped patterns that show up in working documents — and how to address them.
Relevant SEND law
References that support clear needs and provision wording — suggested in-pack.
Example excerpt
Sample working-document wording for this route
Illustrative only. Your pack is prepared for your child's situation — you review it before you send.
I disagree with the current draft wording in the sections listed below. For each point I set out the wording I want instead and the evidence that supports it, so the working document reflects my child's needs and the provision required before any final plan is issued.
- Parent position summary
- Working-document comments
- Proposed wording
- Key meeting points
- Evidence summary
- Checks before download