EHCP appeal letter examples — SEND35A grounds | EHCP Clarity | EHCP Clarity

Document examples · appeal grounds

EHCP appeal letter examples (SEND35A grounds)

Tribunal appeals use SEND35A grounds, not a generic complaint letter. These excerpts show structure. Your full grounds are written by a case professional for the matching appeal route — with a 2-month deadline and mediation rules where they apply.

From £249 · you review before you send · not legal advice

Inside the platform

These examples are excerpts — we prepare the full pack

Match your route, then we prepare the letter or grounds for your situation. You review it. You send it.

  • SEND35A grounds, written by a case professional
  • Council-response matching
  • SEND law in the draft
  • How to lodge

Sample excerpts

Illustrative only — mock names and situations. Not legal advice. Your pack is drafted from your child's situation; you review before you send.

Refusal to assess — grounds (excerpt)

Refusal to assess route
The local authority refused to secure an EHC needs assessment. Under section 36(8) of the Children and Families Act 2014, an assessment is required where the authority is of the opinion that the child has or may have SEN and that it may be necessary for special educational provision to be made in accordance with an EHC plan. The decision appears to apply a higher threshold than that statutory test allows. This pack asks the Tribunal to consider ordering the local authority to secure an EHC needs assessment.

Refusal to issue — grounds (excerpt)

Refusal to issue route
Following assessment, the local authority refused to issue an EHC plan. Under section 37(1) of the Children and Families Act 2014, where in the light of the assessment it is necessary for special educational provision to be made in accordance with an EHC plan, the LA must prepare and maintain a plan. SEN Support alone does not adequately meet the needs identified.

Contents B–F — grounds (excerpt)

Contents B–F route
Section B does not accurately describe needs set out in the professional advice. Section F uses wording such as “as required”, which makes provision difficult to monitor or enforce. I am appealing so that needs and provision are specified clearly enough to secure the support required.

Enter here — free

Select your route and continue

The full document for your situation sits inside the matching platform route — not as a standalone template download.

Match your situation

Choose the closest match

I want to challenge a refusal or EHCP decision

Continues to your pack match — about 60 seconds.