The local authority's legal duty to issue an EHCP
Under section 37 of the Children and Families Act 2014, after completing an EHC needs assessment the local authority must issue an EHCP if the child has SEN and it is necessary for EHC provision to be made. This duty typically arises when assessment reveals needs that cannot be met through SEN support alone — where the provision required exceeds what is available from a school's notional SEN budget (the school's notional SEN budget).
The Tribunal reviews this decision afresh — it does not only ask whether the local authority followed its process, but whether the local authority was right. If assessment reports show significant needs requiring specialist provision, the Tribunal can order an EHCP to be issued.
Common local authority reasons — and why they may be wrong
"The school can meet needs from its SEN budget"
If provision required is specialist, intensive, or not reliably available within the notional SEND budget, an EHCP may be necessary. Schools' assurances about what they can provide are not legally binding.
"Needs can be addressed through graduated SEN support"
If SEN support has been tried and has not worked — if the child has not made adequate progress — this argument loses force. The history of failed SEN support is often the strongest argument for an EHCP.
"There is no EHCP-level need"
This is often circular reasoning. The assessment reports may clearly show complexity. The local authority needs to explain specifically why the legal threshold has not been met, not simply assert it.
How to appeal a refusal to issue an EHCP
- 1
Request all assessment documentation
Ask the local authority for every report from the EHC needs assessment — EP, SALT, OT, medical, and the local authority's decision rationale. Review them carefully: do they reflect your child's actual needs? Identify any gaps or professionals who were not consulted.
- 2
Obtain a mediation certificate
Contact a mediation adviser immediately. You cannot submit a SEND35A without a certificate for a refusal to issue appeal. Ask for the certificate to be issued quickly if you choose not to pursue mediation.
- 3
Identify gaps in the assessment
Consider whether key professionals were not consulted — ADOS/ADHD evaluation, detailed OT, specialist literacy assessment, or a mental health assessment. Gaps in the assessment strengthen your argument that it was incomplete.
- 4
Commission any missing private assessments
If you can obtain a private EP, SALT, or OT assessment not included in the local authority's assessment, do so. Independent evidence that contradicts or supplements the local authority's assessment is often decisive at Tribunal.
- 5
Draft your grounds of appeal
In the SEND35A, explain why the local authority was wrong: assessment reports show significant unmet SEN, the EHCP threshold has been met, and provision needed cannot be secured through SEN support alone. Reference specific findings in the reports.
- 6
Submit before your deadline
Submit the SEND35A with mediation certificate number to the SEND Tribunal. Request a confirmation of receipt and continue gathering evidence after submission — you can add to your evidence bundle as the appeal progresses.
Documents and evidence to gather
- The local authority's refusal to issue decision letter (dated)
- All assessment reports from the EHC needs assessment (EP, SALT, OT, medical)
- local authority's written explanation of why an EHCP is not necessary
- School SEN records, progress data, and intervention records
- Private assessments you have obtained (if any)
- Your parent evidence statement
- Correspondence with the school SENDCO and local authority
- Mediation certificate (once obtained)
Before you submit your SEND35A
- You have the local authority's decision letter and have noted its date
- You have requested and received all assessment reports
- You have contacted a mediation adviser and have your certificate date
- Your grounds of appeal reference specific assessment findings
- You have identified gaps in the assessment and are addressing them
- Your SEND35A states the outcome clearly: order the local authority to issue an EHCP
- You have kept copies of everything submitted
Common mistakes in refusal to issue appeals
- Not requesting all assessment reports before drafting grounds — you need to see exactly what was said
- Waiting for a private EP report before registering — register within deadline and add reports later
- Accepting local authority assurances that school can meet needs without scrutinising the evidence
- Not addressing the local authority's specific stated reasons in your grounds of appeal
- Missing the 2-month deadline — once missed you need Tribunal permission to appeal late
What your pack includes
- Draft grounds of appeal specific to a refusal to issue appeal
- Assessment report analysis framework — identifying gaps and strong passages
- Parent evidence framework — how to write a statement the Tribunal will find persuasive
- Evidence checklist — private assessments to consider and professionals to contact
- Working document to track reports received, gaps identified, and arguments developed
What the SEND Tribunal considers in a refusal to issue appeal
When you appeal a refusal to issue an EHCP, the Tribunal re-examines the local authority's decision from scratch. It asks whether, on the evidence before it, your child requires an EHCP. The Tribunal is not limited to the evidence the local authority had when it made its decision — you can and should submit additional evidence including private assessments obtained after the local authority's refusal.
The Tribunal will consider:
- Whether your child has a learning difficulty or disability that calls for special educational provision (SEP)
- Whether SEP cannot reasonably be provided through the resources normally available to mainstream schools without an EHCP
- Whether the existing support in school has been sufficient, or whether your child continues to fall behind or struggle despite it
- Whether professional reports (EP, SALT, OT, CAMHS, paediatric, etc.) establish needs of the type and severity requiring an EHCP
- The severity, persistence, and impact of the difficulties on your child's education and wider development
The Tribunal's standard is not whether your child is failing — it is whether their needs are sufficiently complex and persistent that an EHCP is appropriate. Many children who struggle significantly in school still do not meet the local authority's threshold; the Tribunal applies the statute, not the local authority's internal thresholds. This is why many families succeed at Tribunal even where the local authority's assessment found the child did not require an EHCP.
Building your evidence base after a refusal to issue
The most common reason families succeed at Tribunal in refusal to issue cases is a private educational psychologist (EP) assessment. An independent EP provides an objective, expert analysis of your child's needs — and carries significant evidential weight with the Tribunal. If the local authority's own EP concluded an EHCP was not required, a private EP who concludes the opposite gives the Tribunal a direct basis to prefer the evidence supporting your case.
Private Educational Psychologist (EP) report
Highest evidential weight. Addresses cognitive profile, learning needs, and need for EHCP. Commissioned privately; fees vary by region and professional.
School evidence: progress data, class observations, interventions log
Demonstrates what provision has been tried and its effect. Tribunal looks for persistent and unresponsive difficulty.
Parent statement
Your first-hand account of impact outside school — homework, friendships, emotional state — fills gaps no professional assessment can.
SALT, OT, CAMHS, or specialist reports
Where relevant to your child's profile, specialist clinical evidence establishes the nature and severity of specific needs.
SENCO report or school support evidence
Shows what the school has put in place and whether it has been sufficient to meet needs.
Typical timeline for a refusal to issue appeal
From receiving the local authority's refusal letter to a final Tribunal hearing, the process usually takes 6–9 months. Some cases settle by consent before the hearing once evidence is exchanged — outcomes depend on the statutory test and how clearly grounds are argued.
- Weeks 1–2Contact mediation adviser, receive certificate. Begin drafting SEND35A grounds and gathering evidence.
- Week 3–8Submit SEND35A to SEND Tribunal before your deadline. Tribunal registers the case and issues directions.
- Month 2–3local authority submits its case response (Working Document). Parties exchange evidence — request all reports the local authority relied on.
- Month 3–5Evidence bundles exchanged. Private assessments commissioned and received. Parent statement drafted.
- Month 5–6Parties may negotiate a consent order. If not agreed, hearing date confirmed — typically Month 6–9 from registration.
- Final hearingTribunal hears oral evidence. Judgment usually within 2–3 weeks of the hearing date.