The legal framework for proposed amendments
After an annual review, the local authority may propose to amend, cease, or maintain the EHCP unchanged. If it proposes amendments, it must notify the parent and give them at least 15 days to make representations — under Regulation 22 of the SEN and Disability Regulations 2014. The local authority must consider those representations before issuing a final EHCP.
The local authority is required to consider your representations but is not obliged to accept them. If the final EHCP does not reflect your child's needs, your remedy is to appeal to the SEND Tribunal once the final plan is issued.
What to focus your representations on
Section B — Needs description
This must accurately describe all of your child's SEN across education, health, and social care. Vague or incomplete descriptions lead to vague provision — if needs are not properly described, it is harder to challenge under-specified provision later.
Section F — Special educational provision
This is the most critical section. The Code’s Section F table says provision must be detailed and specific and should normally be quantified — type, hours, frequency, and level of expertise. Vague wording (e.g. 'regular SALT') is harder to enforce than specific wording ('45 minutes of SALT, weekly, delivered by a qualified speech and language therapist').
Section I — School placement
If the proposed amendment changes the school named, or removes the school entirely, you can object. The local authority must name a school in Section I (unless no school is appropriate), and it must be a school that can meet the needs described in Section B.
What strong cases do next
- 1
Read the notice of proposed amendments carefully
Compare the proposed amended EHCP to the current EHCP section by section. Note every change — deletions, additions, and rewordings. Even minor wording changes in Section F can affect what provision the local authority is obliged to deliver.
- 2
Identify changes you object to
For each proposed change, decide whether it is acceptable, needs modification, or should be rejected entirely. Focus on Section F (provision) and Section B (needs) as these have the most direct impact. Section I (placement) changes can also be objected to.
- 3
Gather evidence to support your representations
Identify professional reports, school data, or other evidence that supports your position on each point. If you need an updated professional report, request it immediately — you have only 15 days to respond, so act fast.
3 further steps when you submit or appeal — Requesting, appealing, and negotiating Section F are where most parents need help — that is what we prepare for you.
This guide shows what strong cases look like. We prepare the request letter, appeal grounds, or plan letter for your route.
Why specificity in Section F matters
The most common mistake in EHCP representations is accepting vague Section F wording. Under the local authority's duty in section 42 CFA 2014, they must deliver what Section F says. Vague wording — 'access to SALT support as needed' — is much harder to enforce than 'one 45-minute individual SALT session per week delivered by a qualified speech and language therapist'.
Vague Section F (resist this)
"[Child] will receive support from a teaching assistant to help with his learning needs."
Specific Section F (aim for this)
"[Child] will receive 1:1 TA support for 20 hours per week. This support will include: structured literacy intervention (Toe by Toe), daily 30-minute reading session, and in-class support during English and Mathematics lessons."
Representations checklist
- You have compared the proposed amended EHCP to the current EHCP section by section
- You have identified every change — deletions, additions, rewordings — in Sections B, F, and I
- You know which changes you accept and which you object to
- Your representations address each objection with specific wording and reasons
- You have evidence (reports, data) to support each objection
3 more items depending on your case. Plus turning this evidence into one coherent pack an LA or tribunal takes seriously.
This guide shows what strong cases look like. We prepare the request letter, appeal grounds, or plan letter for your route.
Common mistakes when objecting to amendments
- Accepting vague Section F wording without pushing for specifics — vague wording is hard to enforce
- Not comparing the proposed amendments word-for-word against the current EHCP
- Missing the 15-day representations deadline — contact the local authority immediately on receipt
- Not referencing evidence in your representations — statements unsupported by reports carry less weight
- Assuming the local authority will amend if you object verbally — always put representations in writing
This guide shows what strong cases look like. We prepare the request letter, appeal grounds, or plan letter for your route.
What your pack includes
- EHCP amendment comparison tool — identifies every change between current and proposed EHCP
- Representations drafting guide — structured wording for objecting to each section
- Section F specificity checker — highlights vague wording and suggests improvements
- Evidence reference organiser — link reports to each representation point
- Appeal transition guide — what to do if representations are rejected